Many of those who took the time to analyze Abdul-Hayy Youssef\u2019s statements, or -to be precise- those whom I heard or read their analysis of the subject, failed to dive deeper than (the surface), or to rephrase: they were satisfied with viewing the tip of the iceberg..<\/p>\n
Truthfully, they didn’t fail to understand the apparent meaning of Abdul-Hayy’s statements correctly in terms of revealing the contradictions, assuming its apparent dimensions and motives, however, they failed to realize the (organizational weight) of Abdul-Hayy within (the Sudanese criminal Movement) as well as the reasons and motives behind the utterance of such statements, its timing or the timing of its broadcast.<\/p>\n
Anyone well-versed with the machinations of the Islamist Movement will immediately realize that Abdel-Hayy\u2019s statements weren’t spontaneous, nor was the person asking the questions doing so in vain (As Abdul-Hayy wouldn’t have risked criticizing Al-Burhan\u2019s actions and positions, when everyone knows that he \u2013Abdul-Hayy\u2013 wasn’t only keeping quiet about these actions and positions at the time, but went as far as to support them, for example; Al-Burhan\u2019s meeting with Netanyahu in the Ugandan capital and then starting the process of normalization with the Zionist entity, “which everyone with an iota of insight recognizes that it wasn’t Al-Burhan\u2019s idea, but rather (instructions) from the leadership of the Islamist Movement, for fear that the Forces of Freedom and Change would initiate the normalization process with Israel before them and thus gain America\u2019s approval and support later.. (And whoever considers America\u2019s subsequent positions in regards to Al-Burhan\u2019s normalization, starting with granting the green light for the October 25th Coup, adopting weak positions towards the ongoing war, and its implicit recognition of Al-Burhan\u2019s government despite it being contradictory to its -voiced- support of democracy as well as condemnation and exclusion of coup plotters. Whoever takes the time to review these American positions, will soon realize that America didn’t forget Al-Burhan and the Islamist Movement\u2019s initiative to normalize relations with Israel).<\/p>\n
Abdul-Hayy wouldn’t have risked criticizing a man everyone believes helped him escape to T\u00fcrkiye despite the lawsuits filed against him, which prompted Abdul-Hayy to become one of Al-Burhan\u2019s stauch supporter, as the former supported the October Coup and praised the killing of demonstrators against the coup..<\/p>\n
Which begs the question: Why did Al-Burhan suddenly become, in Abdul Hayy\u2019s view, an irreligious man, without morals, and a traitor ?<\/p>\n
In fact, these aren’t Abdul-Hayy\u2019s personal statements, but rather the Islamist Movement\u2019s opinion voiced by Abdul-Hayy, to serve a particular purpose…<\/p>\n
Al-Burhan has become, for the Islamists, a \u201cuseless leverage.\u201d As in addition to his blatant failure in managing their wicked war, he has become hated even by those who support the continuation of the war. His multiplying lies have become exposed to everyone, and the idiocy of his speeches has become the subject of ridicule locally and internationally, in addition to the fact that Al-Burhan\u2019s place in the Islamist Movement is basically a place of (Those whose hearts are to be reconciled)… The Islamists believe, that the stage requires removing Al-Burhan, and handing over the banner of war (or negotiation) to someone who is more deeply affiliated with the Islamists “perhaps it would be Al-Kabbashi”..<\/p>\n
I view Abdul-Hayy’s “meticulously planned” speech as a signal to announce the process of taking Al-Burhan out of the ring.<\/p>\n
As for how this imminent procedure will be carried out, there are numerous possible scenarios, among which may be announcing his “martyrdom” and organizing a suitable (martyr’s ceremony), or perhaps he will be forced to resign, or, if he (acted intransigently), locking him up in prison on a charge that suits the procedure.<\/p>\n
It ought to be emphasized that Abdul-Hayy’s statements weren’t circumstantial, nor mere “words,” or even spontaneous conversation expressing the speaker’s opinion.. And God Almighty knows best.<\/p>\n
P.S: Honestly speaking, i ought to state that after I finished writing this article, I read an article by Professor Salah Shua’ib on Facebook that analyzed Abdul-Hayy\u2019s statements with the required depth, in which he concluded a rather similar hypothesis to what this article contained.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Many of those who took the time to analyze Abdul-Hayy Youssef\u2019s statements, or -to be precise- those whom I heard or read their analysis of the subject, failed to dive deeper than (the surface), or to rephrase: they were satisfied with viewing the tip of the iceberg.. Truthfully, they didn’t fail to understand the apparent …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":159431,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8263],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-160248","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles"],"yoast_head":"\n