The aircrafts accidents.. Further implication or an acquittance !!

Nothing brings sin back to the forefront of regret except those attempts to curb its hell, as its raging volcanoes that torment the conscience may return once again!!

Aircraft accidents are occurring repeatedly in a rather successive manner that invokes questions, making it legitimate to ask, what is truly taking place!! Yesterday, an Antonov plane crashed after taking off from Wadi Seidna Air Base, tragically causing the death of more than (40) military personnel and civilians, prompting the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) to issue a statement that doesn’t reflect the true scale of the disaster, as the statement was remarkably ambiguous in its detailed explanation of the incident and the reasons for its occurrence, going as far as to conceal the identities of the individuals who were on board, allowing social media platforms the freedom of interpretation and explanation.

The Sudanese Army was satisfied in its statement by mentioning that: “One of our planes crashed while taking off from Wadi Seidna Air Base this evening, resulting in a number of deaths and injuries amongst military personnel and civilians. The injured were provided with the appropriate medical attention while the firefighting teams were able to control the fire at the crash site in (Al-Iskan) District 75.”

The statement failed to include Maj. Gen. Bahr Ahmed Bahr, the Commander of the Khartoum Military Zone, despite him being a prominent military commander!! He has witnessed many battles in the war and has appeared in more than one video in Bahri, alongside the security elements in the field. Moreover, he has played a well-known role in dispersing the sit-in in front of the Military’s General Command Headquarters.

The incident is considered the second of its kind within (48) hours, as the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) announced that they had shot down an Ilyushin aircraft belonging to the Sudanese Army in the city of Nyala, South Darfur state, however, the Army didn’t issue any official statement or comment in regards to the incident.

The successive incidents, although they indicate an escalation of the conflict in the field, also confirm that the field has become an arena for guesswork and interpretation, which confirms that it has entered the mayhem of ambiguity in which each party can practice a number of crimes driven by feelings of personal revenge or aim to reach a specific goal.

Yesterday, we discussed the cloud of ambiguity darkening the sky of the military field, which will begin with suffocating battles in the process of exacting revenge, settling accounts with one another and will end in everyone’s loss.

Because the closed military offices are now housing commanders running circles around themselves, looking for a way out of the case and crime of the aforementioned dispersal of the sit-in, the -previously stated- cause for the disagreements between Al-Burhan and Al-Kabbashi. As the recent deaths and killing of every military leader who has -even a silver of- connection to this heinous crime, in mysterious circumstances as well, is a clear attempt to get rid of those involved in this crime in order to write a new scenario to acquit some individuals.

The death or killing of a military leader doesn’t change the indictment of the coup authority, the Security Committee, the Security Service, its battalions, and everyone who participated in dispersing the sit-in, because the evidence is no longer provided by the words of the military leaders, and the international justice arenas have documented evidence proving the involvement of the leaders and members of all the forces that participated in the crime of dispersing the sit-in. Therefore, the killing of a leader won’t impact this result, and what is currently taking place is nothing but desperate attempts that could possibly exacerbate the crisis of the accusation against the military leadership, because death in the battlefields doesn’t mean hiding the evidence or covering it up with a second crime, which is often committed under the guise of war. All types of revenge and retaliation carried out by the Security battalions against their political opponents were clear as day and were recorded as serious crimes attributed to the forces allied with the Sudanese Army.

The day before yesterday, Human Rights Watch (HRW) accused a force allied with the Sudanese Army of launching an attack on a village that killed at least (26) people.

The Human Rights organization shared in a statement that, “Sudan Shield Forces deliberately targeted civilians in an attack on January 10th, 2025” in the village of Kambo Taiba, in Al-Jazeera state.

This confirms that crimes committed on the battlefield won’t be considered the results of military battles that can be forgotten and ignored by the records of international justice.

Therefore, all evidence and proof of the killing of military leaders or others through security schemes to get rid of them will be revealed soon, and ultimately, what is happening is nothing but an attempt to implicate, which doesn’t equal an exoneration !!

In Conclusion:

No to war.

Has the international community decided to overlook Al-Harith Idris’s statements before the Security Council ? Are his statements no longer considered useful!!

Al-Jareeda Newspaper